Debate Over Green Building Certification
The
National Association of Home Builders has been working on their own NAHB
National Green Building Program for certification since March of 2004. Various
parties have argued that the NAHB should develop their program rather than rely
on the well-known US Green Building Council LEED scheme. Some people believe
that the Leeds program is too strict and pricey. The fact that LEEDs only allow
Forest Stewardship Council (FSC) lumber is one of the major causes that has
builders dissatisfied. Because not all timber yards carry or are approved to
sell FSC, this limits the supplies available in many places.
The
FSC certification process is becoming more expensive. According to a ProSales
Magazine article, The Forest Stewardship Council (FSC), the key wood
certification basic in green construction, is trebling its accreditation admin
costs for chain of custody (COC)
certification and retaliating against certifying bodies that claim other
standard-setters rules are as good as FSC's.
How
is this helpful in encouraging more vendors and builders to embrace the Green
Building concept? The FSC opposes the use of Sustainable Forestry Initiative
(SFI) lumber in the LEEDs program. FSC opposes this SFI option because it
believes its standard is superior to the others. This April, the Green Building
Council will decide if SFI may be included.
Allowing
builders more alternatives and availability would help promote the use of
certified lumber products in everyday projects.
Making
products more widely available and encouraging healthy competition among
providers brings the price of certified lumber more in line. Because of the
additional expense and complexity of controlling the certification process,
many lumber yards now charge a substantial premium for certified lumber.
However, tripling the certification administration expenses is not helping to meet
the builders' demand for more affordable products. The builder must make a
profit, and according to various surveys, many end-users are unwilling to pay
more than just a 5% premium for a certified green home.
Comments
Post a Comment